Question:
Who was King Arthur.?
2014-02-20 21:47:55 UTC
Who was King Arthur.?
Five answers:
?
2014-02-21 00:17:21 UTC
Traditionally king of Britain, historically perhaps a 5th- 6th century Romano - British chieftain or general . His life and court have become the focus for many romantic legends , including the exploits of adventurous knights and the quest for the Holy Grail . The story of Arthur and his court were developed by Sir Thomas Mallory`s English prose Le Morte d` Arthur , also by.

Chretien de Troyes , and others . The Norman writer,Ware in the 12th century mentioned the Round Table , Arthurs court of Camelot has been placed at various locations by writers and historians including Wales , Somerset , Cornwall and Winchester ,though Tintagel in Cornwall is usually recognised as the site of Camelot



The legend seems to have grown from the life of a relatively minor British or Welsh prince who fought against the Saxons and who won a famous victory over them at `Mount Badon around AD 500 . He is first mentioned by name in the Historia Brittonum by the Welsh cleric Nennius around AD 830 , some 300 years after his probable death .



The historical Arthur is mainly a figure of legend in Welsh and early English folklore . The name Arthur which means `bear man` was a nickname given to Ambrosius Aurelianus , the historical prototype for Arthur, by his men either because he was big and hairy like a bear or because he wore the bearskin cloak of late Roman officers
2014-02-21 17:26:44 UTC
He is pure Fantasy. The stone he pulled the Sword from was in Fact the mould for a sword, called " a stone". When a sword was cast, it was only the person the sword was made for who could pull it from the Stone. The belief was, if anyone else drew the Sword from the stone. Then bad luck would be with them Forever.

The Round Table. It was customary then that if a king wanted to confer with his nobles, they were invited to sit Around the Kings table, not a Round table.

Camelot Castle. Stone Castles did not exist in Britain until the Normans arrived here. All castles until then, were wooden fortresses.

IN days long ago, the only way people could get any news was from the travelling storytellers, and the more exciting the story, the more the storyteller would be paid, so the stories were always highly Exagerrated.
?
2014-02-20 22:57:44 UTC
If he existed at all he was probably a local chieftain rather than king. He was the stuff of legends by the time Mallory and others wrote about him and probably combines various myths and legends to pad out an epic tale, eg the search for the Holy Grail. Even less certainty over Guinevere, Lancelot or Merlin, Uther or Morgana. Nothing to really suggest places like Tintagel, Winchester or Avalon were actually involved, any more than Alderley Edge is the last resting place of his knights of the round table.
Verulam 1
2014-02-21 03:00:59 UTC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Arthur



I know, Wik. but it's as good as any in terms of whether King Arthur lived, or not.
Clo
2014-02-21 09:05:48 UTC
He was the mythical, legendary King of Camelot and the Round Table.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Arthur

Arthur led during the late 5th and early 6th centuries, according to medieval histories and folk tales and legends. He is the boy who drew the sword from the stone to become king.



From Wikipedia:

The legendary Arthur developed as a figure of international interest largely through the popularity of Geoffrey of Monmouth's fanciful and imaginative 12th-century Historia Regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain). In some Welsh and Breton tales and poems that date from before this work, Arthur appears either as a great warrior defending Britain from human and supernatural enemies or as a magical figure of folklore, sometimes associated with the Welsh Otherworld, Annwn. How much of Geoffrey's Historia (completed in 1138) was adapted from such earlier sources, rather than invented by Geoffrey himself, is unknown.



There is very little historical basis for Arthur's existence:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_basis_for_King_Arthur



The historical basis of King Arthur is a source of considerable debate among historians. Due to the poverty of British records in the period 450-550 CE, historian Thomas Charles-Edwards noted that "at this stage of the enquiry, one can only say that there may well have been an historical Arthur [but …] the historian can as yet say nothing of value about him". Historian David Dumville summed up his position by saying, "I think we can dispose of him [Arthur] quite briefly. He owes his place in our history books to a 'no smoke without fire' school of thought ... The fact of the matter is that there is no historical evidence about Arthur; we must reject him from our histories and, above all, from the titles of our books."



Some have suggested that Arthur was a mythological or folklore figure, that other mythological figures also may have become historicised: one suggestion is that Hengest and Horsa were originally Kentish totemic horse-gods, ascribed a historical role by Bede. There is, however, no more early trace of this fictional Arthur than there is of a historical one.



Arthur appears in a historical context as a British soldier (miles in the original Latin) fighting alongside British kings against the invading Saxons in a Latin text of the 9th century, more than three centuries after his supposed floruit in 5th-6th century Sub-Roman Britain. The legendary king of the Britons of Arthurian legend develops from the 12th century after Geoffrey of Monmouth's influential Historia Regum Britanniae.



Although the themes, events and characters of the Arthurian legend varied widely from text to text, and there is no one canonical version, Geoffrey's version of events often served as the starting point for later stories. Geoffrey depicted Arthur as a king of Britain who defeated the Saxons and established an empire over Britain, Ireland, Iceland, Norway and Gaul. Many elements and incidents that are now an integral part of the Arthurian story appear in Geoffrey's Historia, including Arthur's father Uther Pendragon, the wizard Merlin, Arthur's wife Guinevere, the sword Excalibur, Arthur's conception at Tintagel, his final battle against Mordred at Camlann and final rest in Avalon. The 12th-century French writer Chrétien de Troyes, who added Lancelot and the Holy Grail to the story, began the genre of Arthurian romance that became a significant strand of medieval literature. In these French stories, the narrative focus often shifts from King Arthur himself to other characters, such as various Knights of the Round Table. Arthurian literature thrived during the Middle Ages but waned in the centuries that followed until it experienced a major resurgence in the 19th century. In the 21st century, the legend lives on, not only in literature but also in adaptations for theatre, film, television, comics and other media.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...