The notion that King Arthur will one day return, comes entirely from a novel called "The Once and Future King."
The Once and Future King is an Arthurian fantasy novel written by T. H. White. It was first published in 1958 and is mostly a composite of earlier works written in a period between 1938 and 1941.
The title comes from the inscription that, according to Le Morte d'Arthur, was said by "many men" to be written upon King Arthur's tomb: the internally rhymed hexameter Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam, rexque futurus — "Here lies Arthur, king once, and king to be".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Once_and_Future_King
1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLATxHGRqFg&feature=related
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUHusSgAPOo&feature=relmfu
3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6G7KD7h5PE&feature=relmfu
4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVrPjJvIzNw&feature=relmfu
5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Muz0GCllM&feature=relmfu
The legend of King Arthur will not go away.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss4FCBcUzXU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTe6t6eyUQ4&feature=related
Here's a secret which scholars deny.
Camelot
http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&gs_nf=1&cp=7&gs_id=q&xhr=t&q=camulodunum&pf=p&safe=off&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&oq=camalod&aq=0s&aqi=g-s4&aql=&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=4e9e80732daa8d93&biw=1600&bih=791
Why do scholars deny? Because it's so simple and far too easy, yet in the idea of the name Camelot there is a suggestion it comes from the name Camulodunum - which is a bit of a mouthful and so easily changed in time to become Camelot.
One example of such place name changes exists near where I live - now called Burnt Ash but in history was called Burndash.
etc.